THE FOILED COUP IN BENIN REPUBLIC (DEC 7-8, 2025) WHAT HAPPENED, HOW IT FAILED AND WHY NIGERIANS RESPONSE MATTERED.......✍️


The Foiled Coup in Benin Republic (Dec 7–8, 2025): What Happened, How It Failed, and Why Nigeria’s Response Mattered As some Citizens of Nigeria Cried  out that Nigeria government could not use the same force used in Benin to help itself from Terrorism. 

On December 7, 2025, soldiers in the Republic of Benin announced on state television that they had seized power a dramatic moment that briefly unsettled the West African region. Within about 24–48 hours the bid to overthrow President Patrice Talon was declared foiled: loyalist forces regained control, key hostages were freed and the alleged plotters were rounded up or fled. What followed was not only a domestic security incident in Cotonou but a fast-moving regional episode in which Nigeria played a pivotal role. 

How the coup unfolded🙆🤷

Morning to afternoon, 7 December 2025: A group of mutinying soldiers calling themselves the “Military Committee for Refoundation” appeared on national TV and announced the removal of President Talon, saying they were taking over. The broadcast quickly alarmed citizens and regional capitals. 

Same day (7 Dec): Beninese authorities and loyalist military elements pushed back; the government said the situation was being contained and later reported that key locations in Cotonou were regained. Reports also said senior officers were briefly seized and later freed. 

8 December 2025: Benin’s government, assisted by external allied action, said the coup had been thwarted and that arrests had been made. Investigations and mop-up operations continued as authorities sought remaining plotters. 

How and why the coup failed

Several factors combined to frustrate the putschists:

1. Loyalist resistance and swift government response  Benin’s security forces loyal to President Talon reacted quickly to retake critical infrastructure and retake the state broadcaster. That immediate pushback prevented the mutineers from consolidating control. 


2. Regional military assistance, notably from Nigeria and ECOWAS partners Nigeria publicly confirmed the deployment of fighter jets and ground troops to support Beninese forces, and Benin’s government later credited air operations and troop support with helping dislodge the coup plotters. International condemnation and the timely presence of allied forces reduced the plotters’ room to maneuver. 


3. Political isolation of the plotters Unlike some coups that win quick political backing, this attempt appears to have lacked broad institutional or public support inside Benin and was promptly denounced by regional bodies. That denial of legitimacy matters in short, broadcast-style seizure attempts. 

What Nigeria did facts and timeline

Nigeria moved quickly and openly. President Bola Tinubu and Abuja’s security apparatus both condemned the coup and described operational steps taken to help Benin:

Diplomatic condemnation and calls for constitutional order came immediately from Abuja and ECOWAS. Nigeria emphasized solidarity with Benin and the need to restore democratic institutions. 

Military support: Nigeria said it dispatched fighter jets and ground troops to Benin and later described air operations that helped dislodge the coup plotters; Beninese authorities corroborated that outside air support played a role in quashing the attempt. These actions were announced on December 7–8, 2025. Reuters and Al Jazeera reported on Nigerian jets and airstrikes being part of the counter-effort. 

Nigerian jets, deployment of troops, and official statements  are on the public record for Dec. 7–8, 2025.) 

Reactions across Nigeria and Africa

Nigerian public and media: Coverage in Nigeria was intense and largely framed around regional security and presidential leadership. Many outlets praised the swift action as protecting a neighbour and defending constitutional rule; critics, meanwhile, raised questions about foreign military intervention and the legal mandates for cross-border operations. 

ECOWAS and African Union: Both regional bodies condemned the attempted overthrow and called for the restoration of constitutional order. ECOWAS has historically taken a hard line against unconstitutional changes of government, and this incident prompted immediate statements of support for Benin’s authorities. 

Wider African reaction: Governments and international partners expressed concern and urged calm; the episode rekindled debates about the “coup belt” in West Africa and the balance between defense of democratic governments and sovereignty concerns. 

What Nigeria’s action means for Africa

Short-term, Nigeria’s swift support helped stabilize a neighbouring capital and protected key supply routes and trade corridors linking Benin with Nigeria and the subregion  a concrete economic benefit judged important by regional business and logistics commentators. It also demonstrated Nigeria’s readiness to act as a security guarantor in West Africa. 

Longer-term implications are more nuanced:

Strengthening ECOWAS norms: Quick regional cooperation reinforces ECOWAS’ stated norm against coups and underlines collective responses to unconstitutional seizures of power. That could deter some future plotters. 

Sovereignty and legal debate: Cross-border military action  even in defence of democracy  raises questions about mandates, parliamentary oversight, and the risk of escalation. Critics will push for clearer legal frameworks to govern interventions. 

Nigeria’s leadership role: The episode boosts President Tinubu’s regional profile as a security actor; but it also puts pressure on Abuja to be transparent about operational details and the exit strategy for any forces temporarily deployed abroad. How Nigeria manages that accountability will shape perceptions across Africa. 


Nigerians Question Government’s Priorities After Swift Intervention in Benin Republic

When news broke that a coup attempt in Benin Republic had been quickly suppressed with decisive military intelligence and logistical backing from Nigeria  many Nigerians didn’t celebrate. Instead, a wave of criticism poured across social media, radio, and everyday conversations. The question on everyone’s lips was simple:

“How can the Nigerian government rush to defend another country when it refuses to protect its own citizens with the same urgency?”

For years, Nigerians have endured relentless attacks from Boko Haram, ISWAP, bandits, and unknown gunmen. Entire communities have been displaced. Villages wiped out. Schools attacked. Thousands kidnapped. Yet each time, the response from the government has been slow, reactive, or painfully ineffective. People have cried out, protested, begged but the security situation continues to worsen.

So when the Nigerian government suddenly moved with lightning speed to help Benin Republic crush a coup attempt, the reaction was explosive. Many citizens called it a painful reminder of the government’s misplaced priorities.

“How is it that Nigeria can mobilise intelligence, military readiness, aircraft, and diplomatic pressure for another country, but cannot do the same for Kaduna, Niger, Zamfara, Plateau, and the rest of Nigeria where people are killed weekly?” This was the tone of countless online posts.

To ordinary Nigerians, it felt like an insult.

They watched as their government projected power abroad while appearing helpless at home. They saw the efficiency Nigeria used to stabilise Benin, and wondered why the same force isn’t used to rescue abducted villagers, schoolchildren, or travellers trapped by terrorists. Many accused the government of caring more about regional politics than about the lives of the people who elected them.

Some analysts argued that regional stability is important and Nigeria had obligations as a dominant West African power. But even those voices admitted one uncomfortable truth: the Nigerian state has never shown this level of urgency in addressing domestic terrorism.

The outrage was not just anger it was heartbreak. Nigerians are tired. Tired of mourning every week. Tired of insecurity being treated like an unavoidable part of life. Tired of seeing their government act strong abroad but weak at home.

The Benin incident simply exposed what many have been saying for years:
If the Nigerian government wants to prove it can protect a neighbour, it must first prove it can protect Nigerians.

Final thoughts

The attempted coup in Benin (Dec. 7–8, 2025) was a sharp reminder that constitutional order in West Africa remains fragile in places and that the region’s security environment can pivot very fast. The quick failure of the putsch was a product of loyalist resistance, political isolation of the plotters, and timely assistance, most notably from Nigeria and ECOWAS partners. That assistance stabilised Benin in the immediate term and sent a broader message: unilateral seizures of power will face both domestic and regional pushback but it also reopens a necessary conversation about how interventions are authorised, carried out, and overseen. 



Comments